House
GOP Leaders Name Loyalist to Replace Ethics Chief
By Mike Allen
Washington
Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 3, 2005;
Page A01
House Republican leaders
tightened their control over the ethics committee yesterday by ousting
its independent-minded chairman, appointing a replacement who is close
to them and adding two new members who donated to the legal defense
fund of House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.).
Republican officials have spent
months taking steps to ensure DeLay's political survival in case he is
indicted by a Texas grand jury investigating political fundraising, and
House leadership aides said they needed to have the ethics committee
controlled by lawmakers they can trust.
Rep. Joel Hefley (R-Colo.), who
clashed with DeLay so often that they barely spoke and was considered
wayward by other leaders, was replaced yesterday with Rep. Richard
Hastings (R-Wash.). Hastings has carried out other sensitive leadership
assignments and is known as a favorite of Speaker J. Dennis Hastert
(R-Ill.), who made the decision.
Hefley said in an interview
yesterday that he believes he was removed because he was too
independent. He said there is "a bad perception out there that there
was a purge in the committee and that people were put in that would
protect our side of the aisle better than I did."
"Nobody should be there to protect
anybody," he said. "They should be there to protect the integrity of
the institution."
The replacement of Hefley is the
latest in a series of actions by GOP leaders to crack down on a
rebellious ethics committee that posed a threat to DeLay and other
Republicans.
DeLay and other Republicans were
angered in October when the ethics committee admonished DeLay for
asking federal aviation officials to track an airplane involved in a
Texas redistricting controversy, and for conduct that suggested
political donations might influence legislative action.
It was the third time that
the panel had admonished the powerful majority leader. And many
Republicans were miffed because the complaint that led to the
committee's findings was filed by then-Rep. Chris Bell (D-Tex.), a
freshman who lost his primary last year under the redistricting plan
that DeLay had promoted.
Hastert had signaled for months
that he would refuse to waive a rule that limited Hefley's term as
chairman. The leadership not only stripped Hefley of his chairmanship
yesterday but also removed him from the committee.
Hastings, 63, was the
second-ranking Republican on the committee, known formally as the
Committee on Standards of Official Conduct. Colleagues described him as
unassuming and deliberative, and not excited about taking on the job.
He ran his family's paper supply business before being elected to the
House in 1994, the year Republicans regained control of Congress.
Hastings was in the speaker's chair
in 2003 when the vote on the bill to add a prescription drug benefit to
Medicare was kept open for nearly three hours while GOP leaders rounded
up enough votes.
He also was chairman of an
ethics subcommittee that looked into wrongdoing by former
representative James A. Traficant Jr. (D-Ohio), who was expelled from
the House in 2002. Traficant was later sentenced to prison for
accepting bribes and evading taxes.
Republican leaders put on the
committee two new members who have donated to a DeLay legal fund: Rep.
Lamar S. Smith (R-Tex..) and Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.). Smith gave DeLay
$10,000, making him among the seven largest donors among congressional
members, and Cole gave $5,000, according to an analysis of disclosure
records by the watchdog group Public Citizen.
DeLay's defense fund
continues to operate, aides said. Public Citizen found that the DeLay
Legal Expense Trust had collected $1 million from its inception in 2000
through the end of last year. Of that, $352,000 was from members of
Congress and their political action committees, and $646,721 consisted
of corporate money and donations from individuals and ideological
organizations. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a
coalition of eight government watchdog groups, said the donations
suggest the lawmakers are there to serve as "Mr. DeLay's defenders."
Democrats and public interest
groups said that changes made to the composition of the committee made
it unlikely that DeLay's power would be threatened by committee action,
no matter how many questions are raised about his activities.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi
(D-Calif.) said the removal of Hefley sent "a chilling message to
members who value upholding the highest ethical standard over partisan
loyalty."
Fred Wertheimer, president of the
watchdog group Democracy 21, said Hastert had "seriously damaged the
integrity of the House as an institution and his own credibility as the
leader of the House."
Hefley said he "would not
have changed the committee members, because I've sat there and watched
them work with great integrity."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A58884-2005Feb2?language=printer