Back to Week 20 Ethics Headlines
Academic overreach

 The Boston Globe
 TUESDAY, MAY 17, 2005


 The boycott of two Israeli universities approved in late April by Britain's Association of University Teachers may have been motivated by a genuine impulse to show solidarity with Palestinian victims of Israeli occupation. Nevertheless, the boycott illustrates the perils of impassioned academics indulging in politics by gesture.
 
 Leaders of the boycott campaign have said they were responding to requests from Palestinian organizations. At the conference where the boycott motion passed in a close vote, delegates were told about Israeli settlement expansion and the hardships of life for Palestinians after 38 years of occupation and four and a half years of the militarized Palestinian intifada that began in the autumn of 2000.
 
 It is understandable that many delegates wished to make a gesture of solidarity with Palestinians. The boycott of Bar-Ilan and Haifa universities was just such a gesture. It could be rationalized with reference to the asserted parallel between South Africa under apartheid and the Israeli occupation of Gaza and the West Bank. Though this is a purely polemical ploy that distorts both realities, it has long been a goal of some Palestinians and Israelis opposed to the occupation. Their aim is to use that emotion-laden comparison to make Israel the kind of pariah that the apartheid regime in South Africa once was.
 
 Unfortunately, some complaints against the boycott from Jewish organizations have made equally flawed comparisons with the persecution of Jewish scholars under Nazi rule in the 1930s. The British boycott is directed against academics in Israel who often are as active as any outsiders in opposing the occupation; and it is more likely to harm rather than help the Israeli peace camp. Nonetheless, the boycott should not be compared to Hitler's exclusionary race laws.
 
 On May 26, the British university teachers' association will meet to debate the boycott and vote on it again. They can end an embarrassment if they abjure the boycott and instead work seriously alongside Palestinians and Israelis who are trying to bring about negotiations to end the occupation and make possible the creation of an independent Palestinian state.
 
  Copyright © 2005 The International Herald Tribune | www.iht.com

http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2005/05/16/opinion/edboycott.php


Back to Week 20 Ethics Headlines